|
| |
|
Consulting Services |
|
|
Virial, Inc. offers
scientific and engineering consulting services in the areas of
radiometry, photometry, radiation thermometry (pyrometry), optical
instrumentation and radiation heat transfer. Our services include
system analysis, computer modeling, performance assessment and
optimization |
|
|

|
|

|
|
Our
area of expertise
|
|

|
|
RADIATION
CHARACTERISTICS OF THERMAL RADIATION SOURCES |
|
Blackbody cavities |
-
Arbitrary
surface of revolution with polygonal generatrix (inclined bottom is
allowed)
-
Isothermal
or non-isoithermal internal surface
-
Diffuse,
specular, and mixed reflection from internal walls
-
Arbitrary
conditions of observation or detector placement
-
Several
aperture diaphragms between cavity and detector
|
-
Spectral,
total, or band-pass (with account of radiometer/pyrometer spectral
responsivity) effective emissivities
-
Effective
(radiation, radiance, of distribution) temperatures of cavity
-
Reference
temperature matching
-
Spatial
distributions of spectral or total irradiance
-
Angular
distributions of spectral or total radiance
|
| Example 1. High-temperature blackbody BB3500 (A)
with working temperature up to 3500 K, developed by Vega
International, Inc. for
primary standard of irradiance in UV-Vis-NIR spectral range, was
numerically modeled by means of the Monte
Carlo code STEEP3.
|
 |
| Cylindrical lateral walls of
BB3500 made of pyrographite, internal cone bottom – of graphite (B). For
various temperature distributions along cavity generatrix (C) the normal
spectral effective emissivities (D) was calculated. Thereby from
requirements to effective emissivity, the requirements to temperature
field homogenity were derived. |
|

|
|
Surfaces
with artificial roughness
-
Linear
or concentric grooves
-
Arbitrary
groove profile
-
Diffuse,
specular, and mixed reflection from groove walls
-
Large-
or small scale nonisotermality (along groove or whole surface)
|
Radiating
surfaces with non-imaging concentrators
|
| Example 2. Low-temperature
blackbody BB100 developed by Vega
International, Inc. was numerically modeled by the Monte Carlo method. The flat bottom with concentric V-grooves is
covered by Martin Marietta Infrablack. The profiled mirror concentrator is
polished and gold-coated. |
|
 |
| The use of the Monte Carlo
code STEEP3 allows taking into consideration the flats of V-grooved
bottom, which reduce the integrated effective emissivity of a blackbody.
At the optimization of the shape of concentrator, the radiative heat
transfer inside the cavity, formed by 96 surfaces of revolution, was
simulated.

|
|

|
|
THERMAL
MODELING OF BLACKBODY RADIATORS |
- Heat transfer due to conduction,
convection and radiation
- Temperature-depending thermophysical
properties
- Calculation of resolving angle factors
for radiative heat transfer
- Calculation of steady-state temperature
field
|
|
Example 3. Steady-state temperature
field within three teeth (ring-shaped area) of low-temperature blackbody
BB100 V-grooved bottom (Courtesy of Dr. Alexander I. Zhbanov). The teeth are
placed at the distances 0, ½, and 1 of bottom radius. Thermal conductivity
and radiation losses through the aperture after multiple reflections were
taking into account. The solution was obtained numerically with finite
element code ATAKA (See: Zhbanov A.I., Smirnov A.E., Prokhorov V.V.,
Shevtsov V.N. Calculation of the axisymmetrical temperature fields with
account of radiative transfer by the finite element method - International
Symposium on Heat and Mass Transfer. Part 9. Computing Experiment in Heat
and Mass Transfer Problems. Minsk, 1988, pp. 92-94)
|
Example
4. Temperature of
blackbody BB1000 (its construction is analogous to one of BB100 - see
Example 2) is determined by thermal balance of power released in electric
heater and thermal losses due to:
- radiation through the aperture
-
thermoconductivity along heat sink
- coupled radiative-conductive
transfer through 30-40 layers of multi-foil insulation
For evaluation
purpose at the stage of preliminary design the modeling program that
solves non-linear boundary problem for ordinary differential equation has
been developed. On the screenshot below, you can see the time dependencies
for average temperature of cavity radiating bottom and each kind of heat
losses.

|
|

|
|
ABSORPTION
CHARACTERISTICS FOR THERMAL DETECTORS OF RADIATION |
- Arbitrary surface of revolution
(inclined bottom is allowed)
- Diffuse, specular, and mixed
reflection from internal walls
- Arbitrary conditions of
irradiation
- Spectral and total (for given
source) effective absorptivities
- Distributions of absorbed fluxes
over internal surface
Example 5. Effective
absorptivity vs. absorptivity of cavity walls (left-handed graph)
and distributions of absorbed radiation flux density along
generatrix of 15°-conical detector of radiation (right-handed
graph), computed by the Monte Carlo method for various value of
cavity wall diffusity (D = 1 corresponds to perfectly diffuse
reflection, D = 0 - to perfectly specular)

|
|

|
|
RADIOMETERS
WITH COMPOSITE GLASS FILTERS |
|
OPTIMIZATION OF
THICKNESS AND PARTIAL AREAS FOR COMPOSITE GLASS FILTERS
- Multilayer and/or mosaic glass
filter
- Arbitrary configuration of
incident radiation beam ·
- Several algorithms of
multidimensional optimization with constraints ·
- L1, L2,
and C metrics with several types of weighting function ·
- Arbitrary goal function,
including photopic and scotopic efficiency curves ·
- Preliminary selection of glasses
from embedded database
Example 6. Relative response
of photometer comprising Si photodiode and composite glass filter
was fitted to V( )
curve by optimizing the thicknesses for four glass components.
Optimization was performed for L2 metric by the
Hooke-Jeeves method using the GlaFiRa program.

|
|

|
|
INTEGRATING
SPHERES |
|
Numerical
modeling of multiple reflections in integrating sphere for various
applications (measurements of reflectance, transmittance, luminous
flux; large-area uniform-radiance sources, attenuators of radiation,
etc.)
- Several circular or rectangular
openings (ports) and screens (baffles)
- Arbitrary angular distribution
of luminance (radiance) for internal and external sources
- Choice of BRDF model from
several ones with possibility to fit their parameter to
experimental data
- Calculation of illuminance
(irradiance) due to multiple reflection in every point
- Calculation of luminance
(radiance) due to multiple reflection in every point along every
direction
- Calculation of luminous flux
(radiation flux) on ports and detectors
- Calculation of comparison
uncertainties for heterogeneous samples (sources)
|
|

|

|
| Example
7. Angular distribution of radiance incident on sample at
reflectance measurement with integrating sphere.

|
|

|
|
|